by CYRYL JAKUBOWSKI
Opponents of a city proposal that may include reducing
traffic lanes to improve safety on sections of Milwaukee Avenue appeared to
outnumber supporters at a packed open house that was held on July 2 at the
Copernicus Center Annex, 5214 W. Lawrence Ave.
More than 200 people attended the event, which featured
engineers from the city Department of Transportation who presented three
options for the "Complete Streets" safety improvement plan. The
department was seeking community reaction to the plans, and officials answered
questions, which at times led to heated exchanges between residents and Alderman
John Arena (45th), who supports the project.
The proposed project would affect Milwaukee between
Lawrence Avenue and Elston Avenue, but fewer changes are expected between
Lawrence and the Kennedy Expressway, where traffic is more congested due to the
relatively narrow roadway.
One option calls for all existing lanes of traffic to
remain north of the expressway and the existing bike lanes on Milwaukee to be
made wider. The current bike lanes measure 5 1/2 feet wide and are located to
the left of the parking lane, which the department refers to as outside the
parking lane.
Under a second option a lane of traffic would be
eliminated in each direction but the bike lanes would be positioned to the
outside of parked cars.
The third option option would eliminate 20 percent of
street parking and one lane of traffic in each direction, and barriers, such as
concrete waiting areas for bus riders, would be used to protect bike lanes that
would be located along the curb.
All three options include high-visibility crosswalks,
pedestrian refuge islands and curb extensions, which shorten the distance of
crosswalks. In addition, traffic signal improvements would be made in an effort
to improve the flow of traffic, including places where lanes of traffic would
be removed.
"There's a lot of people that are coming up to me
that don't want to grandstand and just want to say 'thank you,'" Arena
said at the meeting. "I've actually had more than I thought that came up
to me and said 'I like option C,' which is not what I thought I would hear, but
I do have a lot of people saying that."
Arena has not endorsed any of the options.
Arena said that one purpose of the project is to reduce
speeding. He said that many motorists drive 45 miles per hour on Milwaukee and
that more than 900 accidents have occurred in the area since 2008.
"If we can calm speed, then we can get more people
involved in the roadway," Arena said.
"Pedestrians are shoppers, and
if any business is not thinking about how to make their shoppers comfortable
walking into their business, then I don't think they are doing themselves a
service.”
At the meeting the Gladstone Park Chamber of Commerce
gave CDOT officials a petition containing about 4,000 signatures that opposes
the Milwaukee Avenue "road diet."
The petition states, "While we fully support the
improvement of Milwaukee Ave. from Lawrence Ave. to Elston Ave., we do not
support the idea of a 'road diet' that would reduce Milwaukee Ave. to one lane
of traffic in either direction to make room for a protected bike lane and
eliminate parking along the curb."
Chamber board member John Garrido said that there are
other ways to slow traffic without reducing Milwaukee to two lanes. Garrido and
chamber president David Wians made the presentation during the meeting.
"These petitions were signed by 90 percent of the
local residents, business owners and stakeholders in the area," Wians
said. "These contain signatures and addresses and are legitimate. Five to
ten percent are not from the area."
"This is not like the business community is trying
to freak everybody out and that their businesses will be hurt," Wians
said. "I want to thank the people of this community who are smart enough
to figure this out themselves, and that's why we've had such an outpouring of
petitions."
Arena said that he does not see the logic in the
chamber's "grandstanding."
"I don't know what their agenda is," Arena
said. "It doesn't seem like a good business decision for a chamber of
commerce to walk into something like this and especially stand next to a
political candidate and turn it into a show because he wants to have
credibility."
Arena was referring to Garrido, who is running for
alderman in the 45th Ward. Garrido lost to Arena by 30 votes in the last
election.
Arena said that the purpose of the meeting was to get
reaction from the community to make an educated decision regarding the proposed
options. He said that the transportation department has done research on the
street and that the goal of the project is not to create congestion but to
improve safety. Arena said that department officials will examine the petition
to see if "there is any validity to it."
"We don't have a choice yet, and we need to see what
the community wants," project consultant John Wirtz said. "I think
most people don't like the idea of removing travel lanes from the road, but
we'll need to look at the comments and see what people say."
"Safety is the goal of the project and speeding is a
big part of reducing safety," Wirtz said. "Right now 75 percent of
the cars on the road are speeding."
"People are under the impression that this is
creating bike lanes and leaving less room for cars, but the majority of people
who will benefit from this are pedestrians," Jim Merrell of the Active
Transportation Alliance said after the meeting. "I think that the people
who attended the meeting were under the impression that there was a definite
plan in place and that lanes are being reduced."
"At the end of the day, the purpose of the project
is to increase the safety on that roadway by reducing speed," Merrell
said. "I think because the road is so wide in certain parts, people tend
to speed. I found it interesting to learn that so many accidents, more than 900
occurred within the past few years."
Merrell said that the alliance, which works to make
bicycling, walking and public transit safe, supports the "Complete
Streets" project and that the transportation department has found that the
project would not cause congestion and people would not lose time because of
synchronized traffic lights.
Those who attended the meeting were not allowed to make
public comments, but many were willing to speak to reporters. Some residents
and business owners spoke against the proposals and questioned the format of the
meeting.
"There's no one here to walk me through it,"
one resident said. "They just have these stills addressing only minor
issues of it. They don't realize that it's just not going to be about bike
safety; who is going to be against bike safety?
"Bicyclists ride seven months out of the year. This
is going to affect traffic and congestion of the neighborhood 365 days out of
the year."
"I thought this was going to be a town hall meeting,
but it's not," another resident said. "It's a quick sales job to try to
market something that they've already approved without consent of the residents
of the neighborhood.
"If they wanted to do this in a democratic manner,
they would have put a referendum on a ballot and let us decide whether we want
it. It's going to stifle the businesses on Milwaukee Avenue."
"The important thing to note here is that there is
no plan yet and that there are three options on the table,"
A resident said that reducing Milwaukee to one lane in
each direction would create bottlenecks that would cause cars to speed down
side streets to make up for lost time.
"You're going to have all this traffic that will
back up," the resident said. "You're going to have problems in the
winter. Who is going to plow the bike lanes? Who will plow the streets?"
"I've talked to many people here and not one person
had a good thing to say about narrowing the streets," a business owner
said. "I have nothing against bike lanes, so this is not about that. Why
don't they just leave everything alone, repave it, remark it, visible marks
where you can cross and where you can park."
Near the end of the event after most of those who
attended the meeting had left, a group of about 15 residents spoke with Arena
about the proposal.
"You're saying we're wrong and you're right,"
one resident shouted. Another said that the alderman is not listening to the
voice of the community. Arena replied that it takes more than 15 people to make
up a community.
"The representative body at (a previoius meeting
held at Saint Tarcissus School) wasn't good enough for you either, so tonight
you decided, let's not have a discussion, let's not have the public have their
view when I've got a full room shoulder to shoulder," a resident said.
"I'm not going to ask them what they think, I'm going to wait until three
quarters of them leave."
"I'm saying you just smugly counted how many people
are standing here, but you did not give any of the people standing here when it
was shoulder to shoulder the opportunity to raise their hands and say anything
in public with everybody here," the resident said.
Arena said that the meeting provided the opportunity for
residents to voice their opinions by filling out a form that was available at
the meeting.
The final meeting on the proposal will be held later this
summer.
No comments:
Post a Comment